|
How can this be conceptualized? Perhaps the
passengers in the carpool have only to sit and worry
about being late without being able to apply any of their
mental focus on problem solving such as deciding which
lane to be in. Like Seligman’s dogs (Seligman, 1975) who
could not jump over the barrier to escape the electric
shock, the passengers in a carpool may endure greater
frustration simply because they perceive themselves as
having far less control than if they were driving. Also,
the responsibility and decisions of driving may give
drivers the coping benefit of distraction.
This stress reaction or strain was
operationalized as increases in systolic and diastolic
blood pressure and decreases in behavioral performance.
But while having greater control as a single car driver
appeared to decrease the strain, the greater control of
having more than one alternate route suggested higher
stress reactions (Schaeffer, Street, Singer, & Baum,
1988). For example, a driver who was frustrated by being
in a carpool may enjoy the greater control of driving
himself to work, even though his driving does not shorten
his time in the most congested areas of the highway. But
if the traffic jam is extensive, the greater control of
being able to choose alternative routes carries its own
unique form of anxiety. The strain of decision may come
from the fact that the driver perceives his decision as a
high stakes choice: the alternative route may prove to be
significantly better or significantly worse. If a
single car driver and a van pool both try an alternative
route that results in being much later to work, the van
pool passengers do not have the added responsibility of
having made the decision to take the slower
route.
High impedance commuting appears to be associated with
changes in blood pressure, chemical secretions, and heart
rate (Koslowsky et al., 1995). The results of studies
measuring the effects of commuting on blood pressure are
somewhat contradictory. Traveling greater distances and
spending more time on the road (viewed as high impedance)
is not necessarily associated with higher blood pressure
(Koslowsky et al., 1995; Stokols, Novaco, Stokols, &
Campell, 1978).
Chemical secretions and heart rate, on the other
hand, are less ambiguous as physiological indicators of
the strain of commuting. Following the “fight-or-flight”
reaction to Selye’s stress model, Johansson and Lundberg
(1977) noted that while increased adrenaline excretion is
generally associated with good performance, the demands
for readjustment posed by commuting results in high
adrenaline levels likely to produce harmful long-term
effects. Among bus drivers, for example, the driving time
spent in congested traffic was correlated with both
epinephrine and norepinephrine secretions (Evans &
Carrere, 1991). Commuting by train may be associated with
increased levels of catecholamine (Singer, Lundberg,
& Frankenhauser, 1978). By analogy, this evidence
appears to be relevant to those who commute by car
(Koslowsky et al., 1995). Congested traffic situations
for commuters has been clearly associated with elevations
of heart rate due to the increase in air pollutants
(Aronow, Harris, Isbell, Rokaw, & Imperato,
1972).
In addition to the chemical secretions, elevated heart
rate, and changes in blood pressure, self-reported
symptoms of commuters include stiff neck, tiredness,
lower-back pain, difficulty in focusing attention,
tension, and anger (Greller & Parsons, 1989;
Koslowsky et al., 1995). In citing these symptoms,
Koslowsky interprets a prior, unpublished analysis by
Greller and Parsons of their own published study in 1989.
It is not difficult to see that symptoms such as these
are relevant to commuter’s home life to the extent that
they can carry over after the actual time spent on the
road. Our purpose at this stage is not to identify all
physiological effects of commuting. Rather, the evidence
summarized above points to the physiological strain of
commuting as a salient factor in the stress-strain
relationship. It also suggests that the behavior of
parents in the home after a long commute may be
influenced by physiological changes associated with
commuting stress.
|